Home › Columns › Columns
On the Web
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy
Related Links
More Columns
- On Tap: These are the things I think
- ClemScene takes you out of Clemson and around other college haunts
- Staton Facts talks about fantasy football and more
Rate this Article
A few weeks ago, I was faced with a serious dilemma. I had to make a choice that plagues just about everyone during the summer months. I had three possible avenues to travel and I didn’t make up my mind until the last minute.
Should I see “WALL-E,” “Hancock,” or “Wanted?”
“WALL-E” was made by Pixar, so the odds were good for it. “Hancock” looked funny in the previews and the thought of a drunk superhero would normally seal the deal for me. However, “Wanted” was the dark horse; the movie had an aura about it that made me think it would be unexpectedly brilliant.
So what does one do in such a situation? I consulted rottentomatoes.com, of course. I’m amazed I haven’t covered this site yet in this column. The truth is I use it so much I don’t even think about how useful it is anymore.
This site combines hundreds of movie reviews and scores each one, then averages the scores and gives the movie a rating on a 100-point scale. If the film gets a 60 percent rating or higher, the film is rated “fresh.” Anything below 60 percent is “rotten,” hence the name.
I know what some of you are thinking. You’ll say film critics are snobby and can’t really tell you if a film is good. I agree, but rottentomatoes.com solves this problem. I understand ignoring a few criticisms, but it’s only common sense to listen to hundreds of critics when they tell you a movie stinks.
According to Rotten Tomatoes, “Hancock” scored a 37 percent, “WALL-E” scored a 97 percent, and “Wanted” scored a 72 percent. “Hancock” was out of the running and I realized I would much rather see Angelina Jolie looking hot and shooting people than watch the story of a trash disposing robot.
Sorry, “WALL-E.” You’re doomed to be a rental.
Recently, Jake introduced me to an online rap video titled “The Average, Everyday, Normal Guy.” The video is extremely crude and funny, but because of the former quality I can’t direct you to it. I can’t keep you from finding it yourself, but I certainly can’t direct you to it here.
Luckily, I’ve found a rap take-off that’s just about as good. It scores because it’s a funny version of Flo Rida’s “Low” and it makes fun of every preppie, collar-popped frat boy in existence. I can’t make fun of them all by myself; somebody’s gotta help me out from time to time.
The video is called “New Polo.” The song includes lyrics like “I got fair skin so I wear sunscreen, vitamin water and lots of protein” and the rappers give shout-outs to Lunchables. This makes me wonder why rappers in general don’t give more shout-outs to Lunchables. They’re delicious and nothing says “street” like a nice Pizza Lunchable. Maybe we’ll talk more about this next week.
Urban Dictionary Word of the Day:Lunchable (n.) — A person not worth dating because they are barely nutritious and ultimately disposable.
Comments
There are no comments yet.
Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.
Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.


IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before you post, consider this:
Please read our official user-contributions policy.
(Requires free registration.)